Pythagorean table for 2010-11 English Premier League (2011-03-11)
Categories: Soccer Pythagorean: Tables
Below is the Pythagorean table for the 2010-11 English Premier League season, for matches played up to 11 March 2011. The league Pythagorean exponent is 1.70. Tottenham has been the real overperformer this season, which few people will complain with. Chelsea have underperformed this season — again, few will argue with that statement — but the most underachieving side in this season, based on goal data, has been Newcastle.
| League Table | Pythagorean | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Team | GP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | W | D | L | Pts | Δ |
| Manchester United | 29 | 17 | 9 | 3 | 63 | 30 | +33 | 60 | 18 | 6 | 5 | 60 | +0 |
| Arsenal | 28 | 17 | 6 | 5 | 57 | 27 | +30 | 57 | 17 | 6 | 5 | 57 | +0 |
| Manchester City | 29 | 15 | 8 | 6 | 45 | 25 | +20 | 53 | 15 | 8 | 6 | 53 | +0 |
| Chelsea | 28 | 15 | 6 | 7 | 51 | 24 | +27 | 51 | 16 | 7 | 5 | 55 | -4 |
| Tottenham Hotspur | 28 | 13 | 9 | 6 | 41 | 34 | +7 | 48 | 12 | 7 | 9 | 43 | +5 |
| Liverpool | 29 | 12 | 6 | 11 | 39 | 36 | +3 | 42 | 11 | 8 | 10 | 41 | +1 |
| Bolton Wanderers | 29 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 42 | 40 | +2 | 40 | 11 | 7 | 11 | 40 | +0 |
| Sunderland | 29 | 9 | 11 | 9 | 33 | 35 | -2 | 38 | 10 | 8 | 11 | 38 | +0 |
| Everton | 29 | 8 | 13 | 8 | 38 | 38 | +0 | 37 | 11 | 8 | 10 | 41 | -4 |
| Newcastle United | 29 | 9 | 9 | 11 | 44 | 41 | +3 | 36 | 12 | 7 | 10 | 43 | -7 |
| Fulham | 29 | 7 | 14 | 8 | 32 | 31 | +1 | 35 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 39 | -4 |
| Stoke City | 29 | 10 | 4 | 15 | 32 | 38 | -6 | 34 | 9 | 8 | 12 | 35 | -1 |
| Aston Villa | 29 | 8 | 9 | 12 | 37 | 50 | -13 | 33 | 8 | 7 | 14 | 31 | +2 |
| Blackburn Rovers | 29 | 9 | 5 | 15 | 37 | 49 | -12 | 32 | 9 | 7 | 13 | 34 | -2 |
| Blackpool | 29 | 9 | 5 | 15 | 43 | 58 | -15 | 32 | 9 | 6 | 14 | 33 | -1 |
| West Bromwich Albion | 29 | 8 | 8 | 13 | 39 | 54 | -15 | 32 | 8 | 7 | 14 | 31 | +1 |
| Birmingham City | 28 | 6 | 13 | 9 | 27 | 39 | -12 | 31 | 7 | 8 | 13 | 29 | +2 |
| West Ham United | 29 | 7 | 10 | 12 | 36 | 49 | -13 | 31 | 8 | 7 | 14 | 31 | +0 |
| Wolverhampton Wanderers | 29 | 8 | 5 | 16 | 34 | 49 | -15 | 29 | 8 | 7 | 14 | 31 | -2 |
| Wigan Athletic | 29 | 5 | 12 | 12 | 27 | 50 | -23 | 27 | 6 | 7 | 16 | 25 | +2 |
