Final Pythagorean table for 2010-11 Dutch Eredivisie
Categories: Soccer Pythagorean: Tables
Below is the final Pythagorean table for the 2010-11 Dutch Eredivisie which concluded yesterday. The league Pythagorean exponent is 1.70. How did PSV manage to not make the title a three-team fight? And how did De Graafschaap manage to avoid the relegation playoff?
| League Table | Pythagorean | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Team | GP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | W | D | L | Pts | Δ |
| Ajax | 34 | 22 | 7 | 5 | 72 | 30 | +42 | 73 | 21 | 7 | 6 | 70 | +3 |
| Twente | 34 | 21 | 8 | 5 | 65 | 34 | +31 | 71 | 19 | 8 | 7 | 65 | +6 |
| PSV | 34 | 20 | 9 | 5 | 79 | 34 | +45 | 69 | 22 | 7 | 5 | 73 | -4 |
| AZ | 34 | 17 | 8 | 9 | 55 | 44 | +11 | 59 | 15 | 8 | 11 | 53 | +6 |
| Groningen | 34 | 17 | 6 | 11 | 65 | 52 | +13 | 57 | 16 | 7 | 11 | 55 | +2 |
| Roda JC | 34 | 14 | 13 | 7 | 65 | 50 | +15 | 55 | 16 | 7 | 11 | 55 | +0 |
| ADO Den Haag | 34 | 16 | 6 | 12 | 63 | 55 | +8 | 54 | 15 | 7 | 12 | 52 | +2 |
| Heracles | 34 | 14 | 7 | 13 | 65 | 56 | +9 | 49 | 15 | 7 | 12 | 52 | -3 |
| Utrecht | 34 | 13 | 8 | 13 | 55 | 51 | +4 | 47 | 14 | 8 | 12 | 50 | -3 |
| Feyenoord | 34 | 12 | 8 | 14 | 53 | 54 | -1 | 44 | 13 | 8 | 13 | 47 | -3 |
| NEC | 34 | 10 | 13 | 11 | 57 | 56 | +1 | 43 | 13 | 8 | 13 | 47 | -4 |
| Heerenveen | 34 | 10 | 11 | 13 | 60 | 54 | +6 | 41 | 14 | 8 | 12 | 50 | -9 |
| NAC Breda | 34 | 12 | 5 | 17 | 44 | 60 | -16 | 41 | 10 | 8 | 16 | 38 | +3 |
| De Graafschap | 34 | 9 | 11 | 14 | 31 | 56 | -25 | 38 | 7 | 9 | 18 | 30 | +8 |
| Vitesse | 34 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 42 | 61 | -19 | 35 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 35 | +0 |
| Excelsior | 34 | 10 | 5 | 19 | 45 | 66 | -21 | 35 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 35 | +0 |
| VVV-Venlo | 34 | 6 | 3 | 25 | 34 | 76 | -42 | 21 | 6 | 7 | 21 | 25 | -4 |
| Willem II | 34 | 3 | 6 | 25 | 37 | 98 | -61 | 15 | 5 | 5 | 24 | 20 | -5 |
